On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 11:08, Jaeger, Gerhard wrote: > Hi, > > On Freitag, 21. März 2003 10:39, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Please reply to the list, not to me personally. There are developers > > that know much more about the plustek backend than me. > > really ;-) > > [SNIPSNAP] > > > sane-backends identified as 1.0.8 > > > > May be too old. But that's a different problem. Your scanner is first > > mentioned in sane-backends 1.0.10. > > Henning is right, you have to upgrade to 1.0.10 or higher... > > [SNIPSNAP] > > > I am using 2.4.18. > > > > Should be ok. > > > > > cat /proc/bus/usb/devices reports the scanner > > > > > > P: Vendor=04a9 ProdID=220e Rev= 1.00 > > > S: Manufactures=Canon > > > S: Product=Canoscan > > > > > > I: ------Driver=(none) > > > > Well, your scanner is not detected by the kernel scanner driver. This > > can't work that way. Something is wrong here because you said > > sane-find-scanner detected the scanner at /dev/usb/scanner0. > > > > At least fix your scanner-module problems or use libusb instead. > After this, the backend should work. > > Gerhard > Thanks, Using libusb and updating sane-backends to 1.0.11 now has it working.
Charles