This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020708030909090402000102 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Can you explain more, may be on your site, with exemples please Georges Jonathan Buzzard wrote: >georges.r...@pacageek.org said: > > >>Why don't you change gamma, to dust off? >> >> > >That shows a profound lack of understanding of what is going on. >Changing the gamma setting is *not* the same as using a separate >infrared scan of the image to find out where the dust is, and then >using a special algorithm to patch the surrounding bits of image in >to cover it up. > >JAB. > > > --------------020708030909090402000102 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1"> <title></title> </head> <body> Can you explain more, may be on your site, with exemples <br> please<br> <br> Georges<br> <br> Jonathan Buzzard wrote:<br> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mide19i5ib-00014s...@jelly.buzzard.org.uk"> <pre wrap=""><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:georges.r...@pacageek.org";>georges.r...@pacageek.org</a> said: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Why don't you change gamma, to dust off? </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""><!----> That shows a profound lack of understanding of what is going on. Changing the gamma setting is *not* the same as using a separate infrared scan of the image to find out where the dust is, and then using a special algorithm to patch the surrounding bits of image in to cover it up. JAB. </pre> </blockquote> </body> </html> --------------020708030909090402000102--
