At 10:31 AM 19/04/2002 +0100, Martyn Ranyard wrote: >Quite understandable, but as a member of the Association For Free >Software, I cannot recommend it as a tool unless it is Free and Free, so I >was wondering if there is an alternative.
I am not aware of one. >I am not implying that your tool is or is not good, but in the wider goals >I want my software to be Free, and my clients expect it. We just have different definitions of free. >If there is not one, I might try and start a project to build one, but my >programming skills only reside in Delphi/Pascal/Lasarus (Yes, Kylix is not >Free either). You don't have the skills but you'll only use a product with the source code freely available :-) Seriously though, I understand and respect your principles. Just hope you don't expect all developers to make all their work freely available. >At 07:23 PM 4/19/02 +1000, Mick Barry wrote: >>Understood. >>Unfortunately I'd find it a bit hard to feed my family if I made all my >>work freely available :-) > >Martyn Ranyard >Free Software Advocate > >icq - 122500800 >irc - Joran on OPN >msn - ranya...@hotmail.com >y! - ranyardm >e - ranya...@lineone.net mick @ http://www.objects.com.au
