Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 06:27:42PM +0000, Jesse Wagner wrote: > > The autosence description is not accurate. It seems whenever I scan > > anything at any larger dpi than 100 the problem occurs. I mistook this > > for an autosence problem but I have found the dpi problem happens > > consistently. > > I tried to reproduce this with xsane 0.84 and had a complete white > image with gv and ggv first. However, if I change the magnification in > gv/ggv, the scanned image is there. If I press on the lens again, > there is only part of the image. Very strange. > > If I just send the file to my postscript printer, the image is complete and > ok. > > So maybe it's an issue with ghostscript or an interoperability problem?
I use xv to test if ps files look ok. xv does display the defined bounding box. I think gv tries to display it on a page and does not take accurate values from the bounding box. Bye Oliver -- Homepage: http://www.rauch-domain.de sane-umax: http://www.rauch-domain.de/sane-umax xsane: http://www.xsane.org E-Mail: mailto:oliver.ra...@rauch-domain.de
