Hi, On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:58:25PM -0500, Frank Zago wrote: > > > - the .desc format description should be added too, and expanded. I'd > > > like to see an fcc id field. > > > > The problem with more fields is the width of the generated table. We > > thought about some more fields for e.g. ADF but if we use yet another > > column, the HTML page gets even wider. > > You don't have too display everything. And a search screen could be > created from that.
Ok, adding additional keaywords is no problem. Some keywords are already ignored in some situations currently (e.g. comment for backends or multiple URLs). > > I don't think however, we should put the definition into the standard. > > Backends distributed seperately don't need a .desc, it's just for > > generating our HTML page. > > Agreed. Could it be an addendum, though? Yes, or just a readme in doc/. Maybe we should even create a doc/developers directory that can also contain your backends' text files that are suited for later maintainers? The mustek texts (in doc/mustek and doc/mustek_usb are mostly for developers also. Bye, Henning
