Hi, On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 09:37:22PM -0600, Frank Zago wrote: > > Overflow somewhere? > > Yes. Now it is a long long.
Is long long supported everywhere? Compiling with gcc 2.95.4 returns: tstbackend.c:73: warning: ANSI C does not support long long' tstbackend.c: In function display_stats': tstbackend.c:81: warning: ANSI C does not support the ll' length modifier > > > > mustek -l1: > > warnings: 0 error: 0 checks: 2893092 > > > > It really does 3 million tests? > > I guess so. There are not unique tests, but often they occur under > slightly different conditions. > The byte per byte scans are probably most of that count, though. This was -l1 (without scans) :-) Probably beacuse of recursion with reload options set. > > mustek -l2: > > (some hours later :-): > > warnings: 0 error: 0 checks: -1416384447 > > > > The test of pnm is still running... > > ??? Weird. It is a software backend, so it should be lighning fast. I'll > check that. Today, the test is finished. It did more then 1.5 billion tests (!), that's a lof even for my Athlon 1.4 processor :-) I guess that's because of the many options that set SANE_INFO_REOLAD_OPTIONS in pnm and because every reload of parameters opens the test file /tmp/input.ppm. With recursion level 1: warnings: 0 error: 0 checks: 19129 (time: real 0m0.311s) recursion level 2: warnings: 0 error: 0 checks: 518149 (time: real 0m0.536s) recursion level 3: warnings: 0 error: 0 checks: 14100464 (time: real 0m6.721s) recursion level 4: warnings: 0 error: 0 checks: 385300332 (time: real 3m3.092s) Maybe this can me made an option (or the default value set to 3)? > > In the default: part of the type check for options I wouldn't just > > abort but print an error message indicating the number of the unknown > > option and type. > > Which test are you refering to? test_options(), there in switch(opt->type) the default: path. Bye, Henning
