On Fri, 1 Mar 2002 [email protected] wrote: > Message: 9 > Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 10:11:31 +0100 > From: Henning Meier-Geinitz <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [sane-devel] (no subject) > > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 10:26:39PM +0100, Irvin Probst wrote: > > On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 21:05, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > > > > > > The good news is that the backend can communicate with the scanner. > > > The scanner bar seems to move correctly. I tried several resolutions > > > and geometries. However, the image is always nearly completely white. > > > Usually most of it is 255, some point have differnt values. > > > > It's fixed now, but you can manually fix this by adding > > -DMUSTEK_1200_UB_PLUS in the cflags of the Makefile.
I plan to write an automatic detection which sets the optimal offsets and gains. Probably, I will find some time next week... > Thanks, this works! I get some light vertical color stripes (probably > because of missing calibration) but it's definitely the original image. > Good work! I think you are right, the calibration has to be improved. I have the same problem with my Scanexpress 1200 UB plus. The sensor is not very uniform. > The Mustek BearPaw 1200 Cu can be added to the list of supported > scanners. Do you know whether your scanner has additional features compared to the Scanexpress 1200 UB plus? If so, it would be nice to support these as well. But I would need some input... Best regards, Andreas
