> and it worked (despite of the graphic-distiller). duster is compiled.
Ah, yeah, if you don't have GTK2 installed, you can skip that one by
using "make -k".
> I have tested duster with different more ore less dusty (and hairy,
> because of the cats here around ;-) ) slides, but I see no big difference
> in the output of duster and the original rgb-scan. This ist contradictionary
> to the log of duster:
This depends on the type of film you have. Take a look at the
beginning of sanei_irclean.c and modify the IR_BASE and R_SLOPE
values. The values give a threshold for the infrared channel according
to
ir-threshold = IR_BASE + R_SLOPE * red-value
where everything is normalized to 16-bit values (0..65535).
> Reading IR file... done.
> Reading RGB file... done.
> Combining files into one array... done.
> Cleaning image... done.
> Replaced 5728 of 6747 obscured pixels.
> Writing output file... done.
6747 is not very much, in full-frame scans with the LS-30 I usually
get about 200000-500000 obscured pixels (OK, that includes the border
which is covered by the film feeder).
> btw: The output couldn't be opened with gimp (1.2.3).
> Message of the gimp: x-resolution is wrong.
Ah, thanks for telling me. I always use 16-bit images which GIMP can't
use anyway, so I've never tried opening the result with GIMP.
Andras
===========================================================================
Major Andras
e-mail: and...@users.sourceforge.net
www: http://andras.webhop.org/
===========================================================================
