Further to this, I get the same issue with digikam, which I believe just
uses the same sane/genesys backends as xsane??
- so I _guess_ the issue with this Plustek (film/slide scanner) may be
there, rather than xsane per se.
In which case, is this forum the right place to ask for advice, or is
there somewhere more appropriate?
(I also guess that vuescan, which works ok, does not use sane backends?)
Thanks again!
I.
On 10/04/2025 21:25, Ian Dunkin wrote:
Am attempting to use a Plustek 7200i scanner connected via USB using
xsane (0.999) frontend.
Versions:
Linux Mint version: Linux Carbon 6.8.0-57-generic
#59~22.04.1-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Wed Mar 19 17:07:41 UTC 2
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
sane-backends: 1.2.1-debian; backend version 1.3.1
'genesys:libusb:001:010' is a PLUSTEK OpticFilm 7200i flatbed scanner
Am attempting to scan 35mm slides, with xsane source set as
"Transparency adapter" and medium as "Slide".
xsane detects the Plustek scanner just fine, and completes scans
happily too.
However, with default / installation settings, the scanned images
appear to be clear in resolution but are _much_ too dark.
Playing with xsane settings (brightness / gamma etc) mitigates this a
little but not much. Behaviour is consistent regardless of resolution
of scan.
Doesn't appear to be a simple hardware fault, as (the preview version
of) Vuescan does not have the same issue.
I'd be grateful for any suggestions. Could it be a calibration issue??
Thanks!
