On 08.09.2024 12:19 Ralph Little wrote: > I have tried to look into this issue online and it seems that the > history of competing libjpegs is quite fraught and contentious. > At the moment, I don't know the answer. In Debian unstable, it looks > like the chosen dependency is libjpeg62-turbo, possibly via > libjpeg-dev. It seems like a bit of a mess. If it builds, then I > would say that it is probably OK, certainly from your point of view.
If you want to create packages with libjpeg9 dependency, I volunteer to test them with my hardware.
