On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:25:56AM -0400, Brian H. Nelson wrote: > I hate to bump, but surely someone can offer some input on this. At > least question 1? > > Thanks, > Brian > > > On 7/3/2013 2:56 PM, Brian H. Nelson wrote: > >I noticed that the fix for bug 9190 (inc in samba 4.0) resulted in > >the removal of the following config parameters: > > > >security mask > >force security mode > >directory mask > >force directory security mode > > > >I have a couple questions regarding this, and haven't really seen > >any good info on it, so... > > > >1) Why were they removed? There doesn't seems to be any > >explanation in the bug notes or release notes. Maybe I'm missing > >something? (not judging, just confused)
They were confusing a lot of people, and no one answered the call on samba-technical for a use case when the proposal came to remove them. Using Windows ACL mappings instead seemed like a better solution. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
