Jason,

Thanks for your input.  Your solution is a good workaround - unfortunately, 
that’s what it is:  a workaround.  To me, it doesn’t make sense to 
add a second ping check with different parameters.  Why monitor the same item 
twice when, with additional “sensing” of the ping response data, 
you can monitor the item once and post different statuses based on that data?

 

My issue with the current statuses are that they are black or white, good or 
not good, UP or DOWN.  With a ping, a slow link isn’t DOWN, it’s 
slow.  There is a gray area that Servers Alive cannot currently report on 
without a workaround like yours.  This can also be applied to disk space 
checks.  If you have a disk space check that reports down on &#8220; < 1 
GB&#8221; for example, SA reports it as UP even if it is at 1.000001 GB.  But 
if it is at 999.999999 MB, it&#8217;s down.  Why not have an additional status 
that tells me when it&#8217;s close?  This is a bit more proactive.

 

The new status shouldn&#8217;t be called LATENT because it could be applied to 
other check types (although all I can think of right now is disk space).  Maybe 
the new status should be CAUTION or something similar.

 

I look forward to your response.


Chris>>

 

From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Jason Passow
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 10:46 AM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Latency check?

 

A whole new status for this seems a bit unnecessary.  I have a similar set up 
using multiple pings and dependencies. 

 


If ping1 frames received in less than 2000ms then up else down (name this one 
Internet)


if ping2 (which depends on ping1 being up) receives frames in less than 200 ms 
then up else down(Name this one Internet Slow)


 


 


Ping 2 would not run if ping1 is down therefore it is effectively between 200 
ms and 2000ms that creates a down.  So you would get a warning at 500 MS that 
your "internet slow is down".    Even without explanation to other admins I 
think that is is clear that things are slow and not down.  If pings take less 
than 200 MS then all is well.  If pings take more than 2000 ms then warning 
will be "Internet is Down and all hell will break loose."



Jason Passow
Network Administrator
Mississippi Welders Supply
http://www.mwsco.com (http://www.mwsco.com) 
[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
ph: (507) 494-5178
fax: (507) 454-8104


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



From: Heath Abbate [mailto:[email protected]]
To: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:30:26 -0600
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Latency check?

Right on the money Chris.

-----Original Message-----
From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[email protected] 
(mailto:[email protected])] On Behalf Of Chris Mang
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 7:31 AM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Latency check?

Dirk,

I think I know what Heath is asking for, so I'll make a "feature request".

I suggest a ping response range with the ability to set the "fast" and "slow" 
ends of the range. If the response is received faster than the "fast" end, the 
item is UP. If the response is within the range, the item is "LATENT". If the 
response is received slower than the "slow" end, the item is DOWN. I guess this 
means a new status too.

In your example:

All frames are received in less than 200ms -> UP
If one of the frames takes more than 200ms but less than 2000ms -> LATENT
If one of the frames takes more than 2000ms -> DOWN

Does that make sense, and would it be possible?

Chris Mang>>
Senior Security Administrator
JDA Software Group, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[email protected] 
(mailto:[email protected])] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2011 3:01 PM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Latency check?

That's how the ping check works.

For example
1 second timeout
5 frames
100% should response

if one of the frames takes more then 200ms ->DOWN




Dirk Bulinckx.
Network Monitoring by Servers Alive - http://www.woodstone.nu 
(http://www.woodstone.nu) DNS Hosting with ipv4 and ipv6 on 
http://www.stellardns.com (http://www.stellardns.com)


-----Original Message-----
From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[email protected] 
(mailto:[email protected])] On Behalf Of Heath Abbate
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2011 9:01 PM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: [SA-list] Latency check?

Doable in Salive?

I would like to ping a host and if the latency for the round trip exceeds a 
certain value then get notified.





The contents of this message, together with any attachments, are intended only 
for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed and may 
contain information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachment, is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the 
original sender immediately by telephone or by return E-mail and delete this 
message, along with any attachments, from your computer. Thank you.

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to 
[email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) If you use auto-responders 
(like out-of-the-office messages), make sure that they are not sent to the list 
nor to individual members. Doing so will cause you to be automatically removed 
from the list.

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to 
[email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) If you use auto-responders 
(like out-of-the-office messages), make sure that they are not sent to the list 
nor to individual members. Doing so will cause you to be automatically removed 
from the list.

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to 
[email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) If you use auto-responders 
(like out-of-the-office messages), make sure that they are not sent to the list 
nor to individual members. Doing so will cause you to be automatically removed 
from the list.



The contents of this message, together with any attachments, are intended only 
for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed and may 
contain information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachment, is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the 
original sender immediately by telephone or by return E-mail and delete this 
message, along with any attachments, from your computer. Thank you.

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to 
[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), make sure that 
they are not sent to the list nor to individual members. Doing so will cause 
you to be automatically removed from the list.



To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to 
[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), make sure that 
they are not sent to the list nor to individual members. Doing so will cause 
you to be automatically removed from the list.

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to 
[email protected]
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), make sure that 
they are not sent to the list nor to individual members. Doing so will cause 
you to be automatically removed from the list.

Reply via email to