If the logfile isn't showing an error then it means that their was no problem is the actual sending (assuming it had to send). If you have access to the logfile of the SMTP server that is being used, can you then see an attempt to send a message (from the SA system)?
----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: "Servers Alive Discussion List" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 12:00 PM Subject: AW: [SA-list] Sending status summary mails No entries in the logfile, the summary is scheduled to 5:50: Dienstag, 9. August 2011 05:40:03 Check cycle starts ( 70- 69) Dienstag, 9. August 2011 05:52:03 Check cycle starts ( 71- 70) Dienstag, 9. August 2011 06:07:15 Check cycle starts ( 72- 71) Nobody was missing alert mails until now, we have now the chance to watch if both servers show differences, but I would take some days for this. The recipients are different between alerts and the summary, I was trying a distribution list (one SMTP address) instead of a comma separated list, no change. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Ralf Minuth Teamleitung Server/Anwendungen Mobil BETRIEBSKRANKENKASSE Hühnerposten 2, 20097 Hamburg www.bkk-mobil-oil.de Telefon: 040 3002-60301 Telefax: 040 3002-960301 E-Mail: [email protected] Auch 2012 kein Zusatzbeitrag - jetzt Mitglieder werben und belohnt werden. Nähere Infos finden Sie hier: www.bkk-mobil-oil.de/mitgliederwerbung -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Dirk Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. August 2011 11:31 An: Servers Alive Discussion List Betreff: RE: [SA-list] Sending status summary mails The status-summary sending is using the same sending functions as the normal alerts. Do they fail often too? Does the logfile of SA show any errors in the status summary sending? -----Original Message----- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 11:01 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: [SA-list] Sending status summary mails Hello, we have the issue that sending the status summary mail is working or not, some 50% yes and 50% no, and I cannot see why. Servers Alive! Version 6.2.2279, as we are in transition from Win 2000 (VM) to Win 2003 (hardware) we have 2 different systems, but they both show this effect. The configuration (configuration file and registry entries) were transferred from the old to the new system. The system names and the sender mail-addresses are different. We tried to address our load balancer or the Exchange nodes directly, no difference. The Exchange admins tell me they cannot recognize anything in these cases. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Ralf Minuth Auch 2012 kein Zusatzbeitrag - jetzt Mitglieder werben und belohnt werden. Nähere Infos finden Sie hier: www.bkk-mobil-oil.de/mitgliederwerbung To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to [email protected] If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), make sure that they are not sent to the list nor to individual members. Doing so will cause you to be automatically removed from the list. To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to [email protected] If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), make sure that they are not sent to the list nor to individual members. Doing so will cause you to be automatically removed from the list. To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to [email protected] If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), make sure that they are not sent to the list nor to individual members. Doing so will cause you to be automatically removed from the list. To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to [email protected] If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), make sure that they are not sent to the list nor to individual members. Doing so will cause you to be automatically removed from the list.
