The logging is for a ping. 

The NT Process is showing a timeout. 

 

IF the problem is related to what I'm currently thinking about then a 
service/diskspace check should work fine.  Do you have a service/diskspace 
check that is not depending on a ping (or other) check?  If not can you add 
one? 

(My idea is a problem within the ping component. we are able to repro a 
ping-component deadlock but we work around that in Servers Alive.  That 
working around seems to work fine on the system were we tested it.  Still that 
ping deadlock is not normal. The developper is trying to find the reason for 
that deadlock.  The debugger tools that he tried have a problem debugging this 
as it can take a very long time before actualy happening.  On the dev. systems 
with the debugger (locked to specific systems) it needs around 100000 pings 
before giving the problem.  Still he's going to make changes to the component 
in order to hopefully no longer have the deadlock.) 

 

 

 

 

Dirk Bulinckx. 

From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Jason Passow
Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2008 12:45 AM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: RE: [SA-list] method ~ of object ~ 

 

Ping yes.  The others are all dependent on the ping checks.   So I cannot say 
for sure.   Upon further inspection it looks like not all checks failed in one 
cycle.  Some went two or three after the start of the problem before they 
failed.   


Friday, May 23, 2008 1:09:51 PM PingStart ERROR: Method '~' of object '~' 
failed ( 170) -  40- 30
Friday, May 23, 2008 1:09:51 PM Name2use: 192.168.1.1-IP: none-Name: 192.168.1.1
Friday, May 23, 2008 1:09:51 PM Packetsize:  32 - nrofframes :  4 - Timeout :  
1000 

is DOWN because NT Process : PW5 status="ERR:  1460" 

 

SOme relevant log entries.  This indirectly caused a major server crash on my 
end so I will be tied the rest of the evening and then holiday weekend.  


Jason Passow
Mississippi Welders Supply
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ph: (507) 494-5178
fax: (507) 454-8104


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



From: Dirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri, 23 May 2008 15:05:18 -0500
Subject: RE: [SA-list] method ~ of object ~ 

If you say all checks, does that include ping/diskspace/services/url/….? 

Is any other software running on the same box as SA? 

On what OS are you running SA? 

 

Dirk Bulinckx. 

From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[email protected] 
(mailto:[email protected])] On Behalf Of Jason Passow
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 9:30 PM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: [SA-list] method ~ of object ~ 

 

I am running version version 6.1.2243.2 of servers alive.   On occasion, and 
with no regularity or commanlity that have been able to find, Servers Alive 
checks fail (ALL of them).  The com checks fail with method ~ of object ~ the 
other just say err.  No extended info.   I am willing to send my latest log 
with the crash if you think it might help.   It is difficult to because after a 
cycle or two my alerts start triggering and reboot servers, services, etc.     

I am willing to collect what information you wish to collect but I need to know 
how to quickly disable ALL alerting.   

Jason Passow
Mississippi Welders Supply
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
ph: (507) 494-5178
fax: (507) 454-8104



To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to 
[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), make sure that 
they are not sent to the list nor to individual members. Doing so will cause 
you to be automatically removed from the list. 



To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to 
[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), make sure that 
they are not sent to the list nor to individual members. Doing so will cause 
you to be automatically removed from the list. 

 


 



To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to 
[email protected]
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), make sure that 
they are not sent to the list nor to individual members. Doing so will cause 
you to be automatically removed from the list. 

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to 
[email protected]
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), make sure that 
they are not sent to the list nor to individual members. Doing so will cause 
you to be automatically removed from the list. 

Reply via email to