Le 03/09/2019 à 09:07, Simon King a écrit :
Hi Vincent,
On 2019-09-03, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
If I understand correctly, saving/loading individual objects is supposed to
be backwards compatible.
This is not correct. Saving individual object is not supposed to
be backward compatible. See
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28302
Thank you for the pointer.
I believe a CAS which doesn't even *attempt* to offer a way to store user
data permanently and reliably is a failure. I'll rant more on it on the
ticket.
I strongly agree that this is a needed feature! But, I was told on the
ticket that pickling is not the way to do it... I am not Python expert
enough to judge this.
Vincent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-support/36286bf2-abb0-2092-0db1-502502946038%40gmail.com.
