On 2018-03-07, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ultimately, the classical canonical form/isomorphism implementations run on > (di)graphs represented by 0-1 matrices, often > with bit entries. So that's how bliss_digraph is represented too. > Constructing it directly might be beneficial, especially if you have a > problem of doing this on many small matrices
For the record: I guess one should then at least provide a sage/graphs/bliss.pxd header, or better: Move those parts of sage/graphs/bliss.pyx that are merely library bindings to sage/libs/bliss.* Anyway, looking at sage/graphs/bliss.pyx, it seems easy to modify your code to directly create a bliss graph. Cheers, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.