> On Feb 28, 2018, at 00:09, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I would be for dropping 'x' as the only "default" variable (defined at start > time). > Sage is unique in this sense AFAIK; there are CASes which don't require > declaration of any variable, > there are ones that don't have any special variables like Sage's 'x’.
I am mildly in favor of dropping this predefinition (FWIW). Also, for this discussion, one can always access the variable by something like this: sage: x=P.variables()[0] Justin -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large, Director Institute for the Enhancement of the Director's Income -------- The path of least resistance: it's not just for electricity any more. -------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
