Very cool, thank you! I looked into UCF a bit and on this page: http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/number_fields/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.html
It says "Doing arithmetic in towers of relative fields that depends on canonical coercions is currently VERY SLOW. It is much better to explicitly coerce all elements into a common field, then do arithmetic with them there (which is quite fast).", and on another page, it says "arithmetical operations are quite expensive, so the use of internally represented cyclotomics is not recommended for doing arithmetic over number fields, such as calculations with matrices of cyclotomics." What exactly does that mean? To me, it reads like it's saying that I shouldn't be using UCF with algebraic operations, because that is slow somehow. So, would it be better to use something else? Or am I reading that incorrectly? Sorry for the confusion -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
