Hi, Vincent Delecroix <[email protected]> wrote: > Anyway, the answer you got is perfectly valid and it would actually > make confusion to not return the trivial answer (1, 1/a, 0) in the > case of fields. Do you still think this is a bug?
I am not sure. This behavior did cause a subtle bug in my application. I made sure the arguments to xgcd were rational numbers with denominator one, but I forgot to actually cast them into integers. It also disagrees with the gcd function: sage: gcd(6/1,2/1) 2 sage: xgcd(6/1,2/1) (1, 1/6, 0) Best, Álinson. -- Álinson Santos Xavier Graduate Student Combinatorics & Optimization University of Waterloo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
