The document Raman posted looks more like a definition of his sequence
rather than a computer code. As for your code, yes, it would work. There is
also something I was told in CS classes: "use temporary variables for
temporary uses"
While
def whateverFloatsYourBoat(a):
n=0
m=0
for i in range(0,10):
n=a+m
m=n+2
n=(m+n)/2
m=a+n-m
return [n,m]
is perfectly valid, it is far from being understandable.
On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 4:33:05 PM UTC+2, vdelecroix wrote:
>
> It does make sense for a computer. The following code is perfectly valid
> {{{
> a = 4
> a = 3 * a
> }}}
>
> V.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
