On 21 October 2012 11:42, LFS <lfahlb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hiya Dimitri, It might actually be working. Not sure, but when I increased > the number of sets ns, it does looks better. Still alot of repeats, but the > histogram looks better. Linda
If there is a number of repeats, something is defnitely wrong. It should either give you pseudo-random numbers if seeded properly, or a 100% preproducible set of numbers if seeded with a fixed seed. It should not look better, but still not right. Something is wrong in that case. Dave -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support?hl=en.
