On Feb 21, 2012, at 21:36 , John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 21, 2012 5:24:22 AM UTC-8, Laurent Claessens wrote:
>
>> Hi all !
>>
>> I want sage -t to test my docstrings.
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> Is it normal ? With older versions of sage the same docstring was working.
> Are you sure it was working before? Is it possible that with earlier versions
> of Sage, the docstring was being ignored completely, and thus the file was
> claiming to pass doctests because it wasn't actually running any?
FWIW, I just tried this with the .sage file appended below.
With 4.7, I got what might be expected (the correct "expected/got error").
With 5.0-b3-gcc, I got a somewhat confusing message saying "Fred" wasn't
defined.
It seems that the docstring testing worked at one point, while now, it doesn't.
I'm doing this on Mac OS X, 10.7.1.
Justin
==============
def Fred(n):
"""
Examples::
sage: Fred(273)
12
"""
print n
==============
--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large, Director
Institute for the Enhancement of the Director's Income
--------
The path of least resistance:
it's not just for electricity any more.
--------
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
