On 10/25/11 12:54 PM, William Stein wrote:

I'm personally not super comfortable with this, especially if I have
to have to be the one responsible for fixing things when they
inevitably break and cause trouble.  From the second I switched back
to the old version until now, I haven't had any complaints about any
*.sagenb.org's not working, and haven't had to restart them, etc.   So
I'm only OK with this if you're 100% on deck, and I don't have to do
anything, and you switch it all back as soon as you can.

I agree in that I'm not super comfortable with this either. And I agree that the right solution is to write stress-testing code. Let's see: Rado had something that was stress-testing things back in March. Rado: if you have time, can you try hammering test.sagenb.org with that test suite?

I won't do the sagenb.org test until I have time to deal with whatever comes up from it.

Thanks,

Jason

--
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to