On Friday 19 August 2011, John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Friday, August 19, 2011 3:28:48 PM UTC-7, Simon King wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > On 19 Aug., 23:32, Alastair Irving <alastai...@sjc.ox.ac.uk>
> > 
> > wrote:
> > > I get the same result as you so it does look like a bug.  I also tried
> > > putting algorithm="generic" into the call and got a different, but also
> > > wrong, answer.
> > 
> > What happens with the new version of M4RI? I gave it a positive review
> > a few hours ago (see #11574). Does it also fix that bug?
> 
> That seems to fix it for me!

Indeed, I can confirm this. I don't know which change in M4RI triggered the 
fix (i.e., we didn't explicitly work on kernels since 2009).

Cheers,
Martin

--
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99
_otr: 47F43D1A 5D68C36F 468BAEBA 640E8856 D7951CCF
_www: http://martinralbrecht.wordpress.com/
_jab: martinralbre...@jabber.ccc.de

-- 
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to