Hi! On 28 Jun., 16:47, Michael Orlitzky <mich...@orlitzky.com> wrote: > > @symbolicfunction > > def f(x): > > return some_expression_in_x(x) > > > Others have ideas whether this is good/feasible? > > I'll vote for good, and have no idea re: feasibility.
Certainly it is a good idea. Concerning feasibility: I am not patient enough to read the examples from the functions/ folder. However, IF there is a straight-forward way to turn an arbitrary callable object accepting one argument into a symbolic function, then writing a decorator doing the same thing should be a piece of cake. Cheers, Simon -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
