On Sep 23, 3:32 pm, sps <debernasave...@libero.it> wrote: > > So sometimes even if you *do* have assumptions working properly, there > > are so many paths in the decision tree that it would be very hard to > > do this sort of thing. I hope that helps you - I guess to me that is > > one thing that makes math interesting! > > > - kcrisman > > Yes, it is what makes math very interesting, and powerful!! > > But, how you know what assumption I have to do?
What I meant was that something that makes math interesting is that you *don't* know ahead of time which assumptions you'd have to make! In this case I just looked at the error messages, assumed something relevant each time, and then put them together. For whichever integral you're doing, you may have to do this. For your specific case, I think that using Maxima straight up might be helpful, since it was designed to be used with a user interacting (to answer the questions, for instance): sage: maxima_console() The syntax is slightly different, and you have to end input with a semicolon (;) in order to get results. Good luck! - kcrisman -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
