On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Jason Grout <jason-s...@creativetrax.com> wrote: > On 9/9/10 11:27 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> >> This should be much faster than "symbolic" (if I >> understand you right, calling find_root and integrate) but have higher >> precision than using raw doubles. > > I believe the standard find_root uses scipy, which is limited to double > precision.
Shouldn't be too hard to follow up with Newton's method to increase the precision if desired. - Robert -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
