On 25 Aug., 02:07, "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote: > ... > The silly thing is, they have known about this defect for 9 months, but it was > given a low priority. 9 months later it damages our car, and the council > denies > they were aware the road was dangerous.
Is there really evidence that they *were* aware of a pothole for 9 months?? So, when they now say that they were not aware the road was dangerous (i.e., inspite of the pothole), they are in fact accusing themselves of a failing safety assessment! Isn't this something they can certainly be held responsible for? But: IANAL Simon -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
