rvaug...@gmail.com schrieb:
Thanks, Mike.
$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-46)
Is there a 64-bit version of the SAGE 4.3.3 source?
-Richard
On Mar 19, 2:39 pm, Mike Hansen <mhan...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:15 AM, rvaug...@gmail.com <rvaug...@gmail.com> wrote:
But on a machine running 64-bit Scientific Linux 5.4, the make
failed.
...
Is this in fact the case?
Will SAGE-4.3.3 not make successfully on a 64-bit machine due to
different assembly language/different ABI?
Anyone having success running SAGE 4.3.3 on a 64-bit OS?
Yes, Sage builds and runs on lots of 64-bit OS's. The main machines
where the tests are run are 64-bit boxes.
What version of gcc are you using?
--Mike
I compiled real 64-bit versions of sage on 64-bit ubuntu und 64-bit
debian/lenny from source absolutely seamless, but had problems with the
"simple" version. (i think that is the version you are askin for?) So,
I can confirm that I really installed sage successful on a couple onm
64-bit OS from source. (I did not try any binaries!)
In one of my last postings I described some strange results on small
machines with the "simple" 32-bit-sage-version-4.3.3 - may be that is
also true for compiling simple 4.3.3 on 64-bit machines?
Leave the solution to the skilled experts and use 64-bit source code!
Regards BB
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or
reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
