Well, for example : - You need to import simpy to use it - For this reason, it does not appear in Sage's documentation - It could be good to be able to define functions and variables as they usually are in Sage and not through Simpy types - Only define one function... I'd have enjoyed the ability to type : rsolve( f(n) == f(n-1) + f(n-2) )
These are just remarks about the interface, though, this function is definitely useful and I think I will make great use of it :-) Nathann On 10 February 2010 11:20, Simon King <simon.k...@nuigalway.ie> wrote: > Hi Nathann! > > Your were faster than I ... :-) > > On Feb 10, 10:13 am, Nathann Cohen <nathann.co...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Their interface is a bit clumsy though, I admit... It could be good to >> be able to do it directly in Sage :-) > > But how would a better interface look like? > > I mean, you define a recurrence relation f, involving a function y > depending on an integer valued symbol n. And then you call rsolve. OK, > it is a function rather than a method of f, so, it isn't pythonic. > But apart from that, what's wrong with it? > > Cheers, > Simon > > -- > To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support > URL: http://www.sagemath.org > -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
