On Jan 20, 4:24 am, Jason Grout <jason-s...@creativetrax.com> wrote: > Stan Schymanski wrote: > > I fell for this several times, and didn't see the error here, either. > > Could either the syntax be made consistent or the error message made > > more informative? Now that I think about it, I would probably prefer the > > latter, as it would not break any code and it does not seem logical to > > declare the free variable if there is only one free variable allowed... > > I am constantly making this mistake too. I'll see what I can do about > it soon. >
I am pretty sure there was a proposal to address this quite a while back, and I actually thought it had been merged. Please cc: me in for reviewing anything like this - though of course the old notation will also have to be supported even if deprecated. - kcrisman
-- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
