On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Alex Ghitza <aghi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 06:30:15 -0800 (PST), Eugene Goldberg > <omegat...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Thanks for the advice, I had some problems building previous version >> of sage, and like that one - it solved by building sage from source. I >> guess building from source is the best way to avoid many problems. >> > > Glad to hear it worked. > > I finished creating binaries for 32-bit and 64-bit Archlinux, and they > are now at > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/ghitza/sage-4.3-linux-archlinux-i686-Linux.tar.lzma > > and > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/ghitza/sage-4.3-linux-archlinux-x86_64-Linux.tar.lzma > > > Harald, can you put these on the Linux binaries page? I will try to > keep producing these for the next releases.
1. I already produce 64-bit binaries (which should be posted). 2. Did you set export SAGE_FAT_BINARY="yes" before building the binary? I'm doing that now, which might (?) make these binaries work on a wider range of machines. Notice how few "Illegal instruction" sage-support mails we've suddenly got in the last few weeks (none!). William -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
