On Dec 6, 1:50 pm, taco <jcho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for all the replies.
>
> Re: William Stein
> I found substitute_function() useful for other purposes, but it wasn't
> useful in this case since I didn't want to replace all instances of
> arctan2, just the subset where the first parameter was 0.
>
> Re: Burcin Erocal
> Your substitution worked admirably well. It simplified everything in
> a snap. Thank you.
>
> Re: kcrisman
> After having fixed everything using Burcin's suggestion your post made
> me realize the folly of this simplification. You're right about the
> definition of arctan2. As you mentioned, the documentation instructed
> me that arctan2(y,x)=arctan(y/x) and so I thought that arctan2(0,x)
> would always equal 0. A little more reading reveals that this is

We are now tracking this issue at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7615
.  Hopefully we'll still get it in the next release, as it is a very
easy documentation fix.  Thanks for letting us know (however
indirectly)!

- kcrisman

-- 
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to