In the context of compiling sage from source ( 4.1.2 and 4.2.1 on 32bit
Debian Stable gcc-4.3.2 and 4.2.6) I find the wiki()  function at the sage:
prompt raises error and no wiki -page appears.

sage: wiki()
/home/angeli/sage-4.1.2/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MoinMoin/user.py:9:
DeprecationWarning: the sha module is deprecated; use the hashlib module
instead
  import os, time, sha, codecs
/home/angeli/sage-4.1.2/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/twisted/persisted/sob.py:12:
DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
  import os, md5, sys
/home/angeli/sage-4.1.2/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MoinMoin/user.py:9:
DeprecationWarning: the sha module is deprecated; use the hashlib module
instead
  import os, time, sha, codecs
2009-11-19 17:27:03+0530 [-] Log opened.
2009-11-19 17:27:03+0530 [-] twistd 8.2.0
(/home/angeli/sage-4.1.2/local/bin/python 2.6.2) starting up.
2009-11-19 17:27:03+0530 [-] reactor class:
twisted.internet.selectreactor.SelectReactor.
2009-11-19 17:27:03+0530 [-] MoinMoin.server.twistedmoin.MoinSite starting
on 9000
2009-11-19 17:27:03+0530 [-] Starting factory
<MoinMoin.server.twistedmoin.MoinSite instance at 0x895480c>
2009-11-19 17:27:04+0530 [-] set uid/gid 1000/1000
2009-11-19 17:28:09+0530 [HTTPChannel,0,127.0.0.1]
/home/angeli/sage-4.1.2/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MoinMoin/request.py:1485:
exceptions.DeprecationWarning: IPv4Address.__getitem__ is deprecated.  Use
attributes instead.
2009-11-19 17:28:13+0530 [HTTPChannel,0,127.0.0.1] [Thu Nov 19 17:28:13
2009] ValueError: *Cannot process flags argument with a compiled pattern*
2009-11-19 17:28:13+0530 [-] 127.0.0.1 - - [19/Nov/2009:11:58:13 +0000] "GET
/ HTTP/1.1" 500 - "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en; rv:1.9.0.15)
Gecko/20080528 Epiphany/2.22"

I could not find anything on this in the list. I am just hoping that folks
who compiled 4.2 would have experienced the same problem. What can I try ?

Thank you all very much.


On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:31 PM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:58 AM, Stan Schymanski <schym...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Did the upgrade still work for you?
> > Mine ended normally, but if I start the notebook and want to do
> > something, I get the message that maxima could not be started. I'll have
> > to compile from source (again).
>
> Try forcing rebuilding of the maxima spkg.
>
>  sage -f maxima-5.19.1.p0
>
> William
>
>
> > Cheers
> > Stan
> >
> > Minh Nguyen wrote:
> >> Hi Stan,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Stan Schymanski <schym...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dear all,
> >>>
> >>> I compiled sage 4.2 from source on my Macbook Pro with OSX 10.4.11 and
> >>> when I tried sage -upgrade, I was asked to enter a commit message. I
> >>> aborted (by typing :q) and the upgrade is continuing now, but this
> >>> does not seem normal. Did anyone else experience something similar?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yes. I was asked to enter a commit message because the README file has
> >> changed. I suspect that the executable bits have changed. The README
> >> file should have no executable bits.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
> > URL: http://www.sagemath.org
>
>
>
> --
> William Stein
> Associate Professor of Mathematics
> University of Washington
> http://wstein.org
>
> --
> To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
> URL: http://www.sagemath.org
>

-- 
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to