On 5 lis, 20:41, kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> wrote: > Turns out Maxima does not like to eat expressions like this anyway: > > diff(f,e^x,1) > > because exp(x) is not a variable. Perhaps it is impossible to use > these in this way?
I think that in Maxima we can use something like this: depends(f,x); solve(at(diff(f,x,1),x=exp(x))+f=3,at(diff(f,x,1),x=exp(x))); which returns at(diff(f,x,1),x=exp(x)) = 3-f, as expected. I still cannot figure out where to put a function which sends the correct expression to Maxima. Based on you previous post, I will look (tomorrow) in symbolic/ expression_converters.py I am very interested in communication between Maxima and Sage and I would be glad to review #1163 but my understanding of Sage is not yet deep enough for such a complex task (changes in many files). Sorry for this and thank you for your work! Robert --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
