Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Jul 29, 2009, at 1:14 PM, dagss wrote: > >> On Jul 29, 7:22 pm, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@math.washington.edu> >> wrote: >>> On Jul 29, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>>>> I'm not sure if or when either of these will be available, but >>>>> neither are trivial. Both questions are probably better asked on >>>>> the >>>>> cython lists. >>>>> - Robert >>>>> On Jul 22, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Ethan Van Andel wrote: >>>>>> Robert, >>>>>> Is there any prediction for when numpy complex types will work? >>>>>> (outside of the notebook, when compiling via sage -b) >>>> I assume this will happen when Cython is upgraded in Sage, i.e. >>>> #6438 / >>>> 4.1.1. If it doesn't, please send cython-dev (or me if you can't be >>>> bothered) a mail. >>> No, that doesn't work with plain Cython either. Perhaps we need to >>> require casting with extern typedefs? >> Ahh, of course; "Cython complex" (either C99 or custom structs) are >> not >> compatible with NumPy structs. >> >> I've selected this strategy: >> >> http://trac.cython.org/cython_trac/ticket/347 >> >> Fix is up in cython repo. > > Ah, that's a lot simpler than I was thinking of. So npy_complex128 > still doesn't work, but it's never used.
Well, npy_complex128 should probably be used if one is e.g. using PyArray_GETITEM1. So the two fills different purposes. -- Dag Sverre --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
