Hi William,
On Jun 18, 12:14 pm, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote:
...
> You can also do
>
> sage: R.<t> = ZZ[]
>
> which doesn't look like a double definition. That's what I usually do.
Sure. But when you see Mikie's post from June 17, this is what he did.
The only problem was (as pointed out by other people) that it can't be
used in a python script, due to the missing Sage preparser.
Cheers,
Simon
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
