Dear Mike,
On Dec 15, 8:24 pm, "Mike Hansen" <mhan...@gmail.com> wrote:
-- snip --
> > partition support you are working on. I understand the syntax for
> > adding assumptions but from what you have written I'm not sure what
> > variable (?) I would use in an assumption.
>
> I'm not 100% sure what you're asking. The code I posted is a function
> which returns the exact number of solutions to your problem. You
> don't need to add any extra conditions.
I guess Sonny refers to the original post, where the following
conditions are stated:
> - (a_i,b_i) \neq (a_j,b_j) for i, j different
> - a_i, b_i >= -1
> - a_i+b_i > 0
Are they implicit in your code? I don't see it, I'm afraid...
Cheers,
Simon
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
