On Dec 4, 2008, at 10:31 PM, pong wrote: > Robert, thanks for clearing that up for me. > > However, I think it's still desirable to leave "unsorted" as an > option, even though as you said now sorting doesn't take up the > majority of the time. For example, it will be a waste of computing > time if divisors is followed by some operations that may screw up the > order but then one does want a sorted result at the end.
Ok, perhaps you could make that note on the ticket. FYI, the sorting of integer divisors now happens as they are computed, so there is no "unsorted" version. - Robert --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
