Jason Grout wrote: > Simon King wrote: >> Dear Jason, >> >> On Dec 3, 7:54 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Wow, Sage will redefine symbols that are already existing to accommodate >>> what should be a dummy variable? This looks seriously wrong and looks >>> like it could really mess things up. >> I don't think so. Admittedly I don't like that x is pre-defined, but >> here it is something else.
This is getting off-topic (I'm the one to blame), so I'll take it over to sage-devel, where it probably belongs anyway. Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
