Hi Robert, > > Again, if I want performance I could use i^2., > > Um... that's *slower*, right?
I really did not expect that i^2. is slower than i^2, in my problem I needed performance, for this I wrote i = CDF(I) in the first line of my script, not just for performance, it can also leed to errors if functions expect numbers and not symbolic expressions as input, or even worse to extremly slow computation, what I want to say is that I nevertheless don't understand why i^2 is not be treated like a symbolic expression ... I hope I will sometimes ..:-) Georg --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
