On Nov 24, 6:17 pm, Tim Lahey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2008, at 9:05 PM, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
> >> I can easily run timing comparisons between maxima and FriCAS, but
> >> because
> >> of how sympy does things (with its separate variables), I'll have
> >> to run
> >> them separately. Comparing maxima and FriCAS, the timings are pretty
> >> close on
> >> both for most of the ones I've tried. A few were much longer in
> >> FriCAS.
>
> >> I have a pretty long list of integrals to go through and I've only
> >> done 16.
>
> > Many thanks for doing this!
>
> > William
>
> No problem. Once it's done it should help as automated tests for both
> monitoring performance and correctness. I'll be happy to donate them
> to the cause. It's going to take a while.
>
> The timeit routines give results that look like:
> 5 loops, best of 3: 50 ms per loop
>
> Does anybody have something to pull out the specific time (50ms)?
We have a timeit doctest framework that is supposed to hunt for speed
regressions. It is merged in 3.2, but we need infrastructure to
compare the output from several runs.
But I guess you are asking if timeit('foo') could return the time so
that one can do something with the data? I am not sure how that is
possible, but the timeit doctesting framework somehow does it.
> Cheers,
>
> Tim.
Cheers,
Michael
> ---
> Tim Lahey
> PhD Candidate, Systems Design Engineering
> University of Waterloo
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
