Jason Merrill wrote: > This is http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3717. Feeling > motivated to fix it?
Ah, yes. Thanks for pointing out the trac ticket; I remember the request now. I've spent a bit of time today looking at this, but became convinced that it was a little harder than I thought since it seems like the job is passed off to maxima (i.e., I couldn't see an easy place to just add a _latex_ function and have it work). Can anyone confirm/deny this? The thought went through my head that this (solving the trac ticket above) would be a lot easier once the ginac code was merged. Is that true? Do we see the ginac code being merged for 3.1.3, given Burcin's response on the other thread? Thanks, Jason > > JM > > On Sep 16, 6:56 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm writing an @interact to solve simple 2nd order differential >> equations and plot solutions. In it, I'd like to typeset the formula: >> >> show(a*diff(y,t,2)+b*diff(y,t)+c==0) >> >> However, what shows up is the word "diff" when I'd really like to see >> math notation for a partial or total derivative (depending on the >> independent variables declared for y). Is there a nice way to get it to >> show up? >> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
