There have been tons of great improvements to the plotting making their way through trac lately. Do any of those changes for ranges etc. deal with the very weird output one gets for e.g.
sage: plot((x-1)/(x+2),-4,4) or, worse, sage: plot(tan,-20,20) In both cases, Sage isn't "recognizing" the asymptotes, and then the scale gets thrown off, not to mention the non-existent-but-plotted connections across discontinuities. I should point out that this is under 3.0.6, and I was unable to log in to the online notebook to verify this still exists under 3.1.1; there is nothing after 3.0.6 at http://www.sagemath.org/src/announce/, so I couldn't check the changelog very easily to see if this had been fixed, though I couldn't find anything quite about this specific issue in the trac either. Thanks for the improvements, and thanks for any answers to this. - kcrisman PS - related to this are two points which don't seem to fit elsewhere but about which I am curious: 1) It would be useful for those involved to put a summary of the plotting improvements/changes in internals on a wiki page, once the whole overhaul is complete. 2) Specifically, will the old syntax plot(sin,-5,5) continue to be valid under the new plot(sin,(-5,5)) syntax, or will it be completely deprecated? Despite the logic of the new syntax, the old one is REALLY convenient and intuitive, and it would be a shame to have to change all those old worksheets... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
