Finite fields would be rather easy -- especially in characteristic 2! John
2008/5/28 [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Particularly number fields. But if this could be done for more general > fields then even better:) > > Cheers > > > On May 28, 8:43 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 12:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Hello, I'm stuck trying to do something in MAGMA (sorry but the >> > support on that front seems to be lacking). Having a field K, i'm >> > trying to set up K^*/(K^*)^2 with some sort of structure. >> >> > Thanks and apologies if this is slightly irrelevant to the group. >> >> When you asked on irc that you had a magma question, I didn't >> realize it would be this incredibly vague. Seriously, that question >> is way way way too vague. >> >> -- William > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
