On May 23, 5:52 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why don't you do
>
> child.expect('sage: ')Because, I was too focused on using child.after, instead of child.before, but your suggestion works great; thanks for that. So I incorporated your suggestion and re-worked and expanded my examples of calling Sage from Mathematica. The new version seems to work fairly well and is posted in the old spot: http://facstaff.unca.edu/mcmcclur/Mathematica/Sage/ The examples are all graph-theoretic and illustrate that Sage is generally faster than Combinatorica. I also exported a Sage notebook to a webpage comparing Sage's is_isomorphic to Combinatorica's IsomorphicQ: http://facstaff.unca.edu/mcmcclur/Mathematica/Sage/GraphIsomorphism.html Mark --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
