thanks -- I'll never use anything else from now on! (well ok, I'll use rnage() for loop indices).
John On 22/01/2008, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > By the way, I very often use the [a..b] notation, which returns > Sage integers, and is very fast and has the (a..b) generator > notation as well (and is very familiar to Magma users like me): > > sage: [q for q in [1..100] if q.is_square()] > [1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100] > sage: [q for q in (1..100) if q.is_square()] > [1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100] > > sage: [q for q in [1,3,5,..100] if q.is_square()] > [1, 9, 25, 49, 81] > > > On Jan 22, 2008 12:57 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > John Cremona wrote: > > > Thanks for the detailed explanation -- answering all points except > > > "Why the s in srange?"! > > > > > > > srange = "sage range"? > > > > Jason > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > William Stein > Associate Professor of Mathematics > University of Washington > http://wstein.org > > > > -- John Cremona --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
