On Dec 31, 2007 6:16 PM, pgdoyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The following behavior is not what I want or expect for the ordering > of terms when Sage displays a polynomial: > > sage: 1-x > 1 - x > sage: 1+x > x + 1 > sage: 1-x^2 > 1 - x^2 > sage: 1+x^2 > x^2 + 1 > sage: 1+x-x^2 > -x^2 + x + 1 > sage: 1+x+x^2 > x^2 + x + 1 > > Is there some way to let Sage know that I'd prefer a consistent > ordering of the terms in a polynomial? I mean, without working in > some other ring? > > I look forward to the day when Sage can keep track of the order of the > approximation when multiplying and dividing Taylor series. Meanwhile,
Yes. This was one example that I pointed out that I don't know how to implement using the current maxima wrappers in Sage here (see the last email, section 1): http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/2308561f175a0674/ No one answered, which means the answer is probably not easy. Ondrej --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/ and http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
