> I think in the long-run Sage will have to completely implement its own solve > function, which is better than Maxima's. Thoughts from Ondrej-sympy would be > appreciated here.
Isn't solve supposed to return an analylic solution only? Is there an analytic solution to this equation? It doesn't seem so to me. My thoughts on these issues are still the same - slowly replacing Maxima with our own things in Python, that are easy to fix and easy to extend. But they need to do the same things as Maxima first (and be as fast as Maxima). Ondrej --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/ and http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
