On Nov 7, 2007 7:22 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Nov 7, 4:17 pm, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dear Martin,
> >
>
> Hello Simon,
>
> > > Actually, for Singular it is trivial:
> >
> > > sage: R=singular.ring(0,'(x(1..10))','dp')
> > > sage: t= singular.cputime()
> > > sage: singular.eval('ideal G = maxideal(14)')
> > > sage: singular.cputime(t)
> >
> > This is indeed non-trivial! Even when i compute maxideal(19), which
> > takes a couple of seconds, singular.cputime(t) only returns 0.001. I
> > doubt that this is the correct time.
> >
>
> If you can reproduce this with a "stock" Singular somebody ought to
> report this back to Hannes.
Just for the record, I do *not* see the problem / discrepeancy that Simon
King is observing:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sage
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| SAGE Version 2.8.12, Release Date: 2007-11-06 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information. |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage: R=singular.ring(0,'(x(1..10))','dp')
sage: t= singular.cputime()
sage: time singular.eval('ideal G = maxideal(14)')
CPU times: user 0.00 s, sys: 0.00 s, total: 0.00 s
Wall time: 0.29
''
sage: singular.cputime(t)
0.28999999999999998
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/ and http://sage.scipy.org/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
